On October 29, 2026, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced that it had voted the previous day to rescind its 2012 Enforcement Guidance on the Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment Decisions Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. The rescission is effective immediately.
The announcement changes the agency’s guidance, but employers should not interpret it as permission to disregard employment discrimination laws or other requirements governing criminal background checks.
What Changed
The EEOC has withdrawn the 2012 guidance addressing employers’ consideration of arrest and conviction records. The agency expressly stated that its action does not reinstate policy statements superseded by that guidance or require employers to abandon lawful practices adopted in response to it.
The EEOC also emphasized that Title VII continues to prohibit discrimination based on race or national origin, including employment requirements used as proxies for intentional discrimination. The agency stated that it will continue enforcing those protections.
What Has Not Changed
Rescinding agency guidance does not amend Title VII or eliminate obligations imposed by other federal, state, or local laws.
Title VII’s statutory framework continues to address both intentional discrimination and disparate impact. Although the rescission comes amid a broader shift in federal enforcement policy concerning disparate-impact liability, Title VII continues to recognize disparate-impact claims. A screening policy that appears neutral may still face a disparate-impact challenge if it disproportionately excludes a protected group and the employer cannot establish the required job-relatedness and business necessity. Employers should therefore avoid assuming that consistent application alone makes a criminal history policy lawful.
Other background screening requirements also remain relevant:
Steps Employers Should Consider
Employers should use this development as an opportunity to review their screening practices with counsel rather than automatically broaden exclusions or discontinue existing safeguards.
A review should include:
Lawful practices adopted following the 2012 guidance may remain useful and, in some jurisdictions, may be independently required. Any changes should account for the employer’s locations, positions, and applicable legal obligations.
For more information about the EEOC’s announcement or assistance reviewing criminal background screening policies and hiring procedures, contact Chartwell’s Labor & Employment team.